Gitlab or github reddit
WebGitLab is losing a ton of money (last year they lost about $200M). Luckily they raised about $800M from the IPO which gives them a few years of runway. My expectation is they will scale engineering and sales to keep up with GitHub. GitHub is extremely strong competition, but not for reasons people typically mention.
Gitlab or github reddit
Did you know?
WebBitBucket and GitHub keep the branches separate. This really helps my history stay clean but more meaningful because your merge squash looks like a merged branch rather than unmerged. With that said, my customers mostly use self-hosted BitBucket servers, so I use those of the time. 1. WebI was under impression GitLab blew GitHub out of the water when it came to features. I believe that unlimited free private repos are one of the most powerful features of GitLab for regular non-business users. BitBucket had this as well. There was no mass exodus when it …
WebI have written my script in user data and executed it. The other installations mentioned in the script have run successfully except for gitlab_runner..Can someone help me. This is the script which i was trying to run : #!/bin/bash touch /tmp/log.txt echo "SUCCESS!!" > /tmp/log.txt sudo yum -y update echo "installing updates" sudo yum install -y git WebGitLab vs. GitHub for open-source projects. GitHub is the standard nowadays not only as a source code repository but also as a place of collaboration for open-source projects: a lot of the interaction between project members and the wider community is made through GitHub Issues or Pull Requests. As such, GitHub is often referred to as “the ...
WebYes I’d recommend going with GitHub Actions too since the repos are on GitHub. You will have a seamless experience and integration process. Plus it provides a lot of Actions (Marketplace steps). The community is forever growing and introducing new tools to help automate some of the most tedious process on CI/CD pipeline. WebAzure DevOps has lots of ways to do the same thing (and IMO probably too much- build pipelines vs release pipelines, all the different board tools). GitHub is more developer-focused with the project/org management tools being built out and requires some customization. c-digs • 2 yr. ago.
WebIMO, the most of general purpose open-source projects are on GitHub. The GitLab is feels to me to be more oriented on providing more power and features to projects, but worse social interaction. GitLab offered ability to pick any static-site-generator for GitLab pages build, and GitLab CI/CD for years already.
WebGitLab directly offers many of these features, whereas GitHub relies heavily on third-party integrations for most. It comes down to whether you want to do things the GitLab Way, or you want to mix and match third-party offerings. If the former, GitLab. If the latter, GitHub. Concise and super helpful. psychologist testing codingWebSeems like Gitlab/Github issues will replace Jira : r/agile. by SrirachaPizza. Seems like most already pay for it, it has issue tracking features, it supports agile workflows, and can do 90% of what Jira can do. Out of curiosity I looked up the google trends for "Jira" and year over year it has been decelerating for all of 2024 (even before ... host havoc rconWebYes. A student at Waterloo falsified a bunch of awards and some projects on his resume and got internships at some big companies. Not saying you should do it, but the answer to your question is yes. Most big companies don't care about your personal projects. host havoc migration serviceWebTo create a better experience using GitLab services, I, my team and my friends, miss an App to be used with the services of the company, when I joined GitLab I was impressed with the service, but I missed an App for interact with the company, as I mentioned in the comment above the GitHub Desktop was created for GitHub not for GitLab, so some … psychologist that accept cignaWebGitLab CI/CD being the best thing ever is a strong sentiment (echo chamber?) in this subreddit. From my experience, having actually used both it and GitHub Actions fairly extensively, I can tell you I much prefer GitHub Actions and … host havoc helpWebGitlab CI is built into Gitlab, and users don't need more than a single location to check builds. Build/Deploy artifacts paradigm is largely irrelevant for a lot of the builds we do. Git submodules are finicky and require extra configuration. Build agents are expensive. host havoc processingWebMy version is Self Hosted GitLab Community Edition 13.12.2, which should be compatible with the link, as it says that coverage visualization is included in all tiers and was implemented in 12.9 and feature flag removed in 13.5 Example from link (sorry for bad formatting, look at python example in link otherwise: run tests: stage: test host havoc panel